Return to Legalmart Home
My Channel - Registration is FREE! About Legalmart Contact Us Go to the Home Page






 
Log In to My Channel
Username:

Password:

OR register

 

 

 

 

 

HOME >LAWYER AFFILIATE >INTERNET STRATEGY


This information has been provided by Australian Lawyer Ann Janssen

Internet Strategy: Part 1

How are Lawyers dealing with this New Technology?

1. INTRODUCTION   [top]

Despite setbacks in the Internet industry this year, the Internet continues to change and transform the way businesses deliver their services. With lower overheads, we are already seeing changes in the retail sector by cyber companies including Dell Computers and Amazon, who are now making serious inroads into the market share of their big league terrestrial counterparts such as IBM and Barnes & Noble. 

What is still largely unknown is exactly how the Internet will change the delivery of personal services, such as the law. Will lawyers be immune from the dynamics of the marketplace? How is the adoption of the Internet by lawyers different to its adoption by business generally? Before we can answer these questions, we need to understand how lawyers are using the Internet now.

2. INTERNET ADOPTION BY LAWYERS 
[top]

Earlier this year, as part of my Masters studies, I undertook a study of Brisbane law firms to ascertain Internet adoption rates amongst small, medium and large law firms, as well as how they were using this new technology. Whilst similar studies are planned for N.S.W and Victoria, the findings for Queensland would probably be reflective of the national legal e-landscape. 

The study was based on a random sample from the total population of Brisbane law firms as at April 2000. The sample size represented just under 4% of the total law firm population. 
The selected firms were then categorized as small, medium or large based on the following parameters:

Size Definition

  • Small 1 or 2 partners
  • Medium 3 - 9 partners inclusive
  • Large 10 or more partners

The random sample included law firms from both CBD and suburban locations and in all size categories. The selected law firms were asked a series of questions relating to whether they were connected to the Internet and how they used it in their day-to-day business operations. The collected data was then assessed using quantitative methods. 

What are the Internet connection rates amongst law firms?

The results found that the Internet adoption rate amongst law firms was high, with all firms in the medium and large categories being connected, and 73.3% of small firms being connected. These are even higher than the connection rates for businesses generally (Small Business Index, May, 1999). 

All firms in the sample who were not connected to the Internet (26.7%) fell into the small size category. They primarily gave one of the two following reasons for not using the Internet:

  1. they could see no benefit of the Internet for their practice
  2. they did see benefits, but did not have the time/resources to implement it

Another interesting finding was that all large firms had connected at an earlier stage than either their small or medium counterparts (all large firms in the sample had connected before 1998). Medium and small firms have been slower to connect, with the majority only connecting in the last 2 years.

With respect to having a web page, rates were very high amongst large and medium firms, and very low amongst small firms. 

TABLE: Do you have a Web Page?

Size  Yes %
All  33.3%
Small  13.3%
Medium  66.7%
Large  100%

When we compare these figures with those for Australian businesses generally, we see that more small businesses in general have web pages (18%) than small law firms (13.3%), but larger law firms (66.7%-100%) outpace large business enterprises generally (48%) in web page adoption. 

Further, the reasons for having a web page seem to be fundamentally different between businesses in general and law firms. When asked for the perceived benefits of having a web page, most law firms advised that it was to provide information and an electronic presence to their existing clients. Large law firms also felt that a key purpose of their Web site was to attract new employees. However, the main reason cited by Australian businesses for a web presence was to grow their business by expanding into new geographic regions and gaining new clients (Small Business Index and ABS statistics).

What Internet services are small, medium and large law firms using?

The results of our study reveal that all sample firms who were connected to the Internet use it extensively for communication functions (email), and for collecting information (legal and non-legal research). 

Email is the most popular use of the Internet for law firms. When asked to rate who they communicated with most frequently using this medium, sample law firms listed the following in priority order:

  • for communication with Queensland based clients
  • for communication with other law firms

(NOTE: Internal email would be the most popular form of communication but was not included in our study as it is not, strictly speaking, an Internet service).

It is interesting to note that 91% of the clients of sample law firms were located in Queensland. Even the large firms in the sample (apart from one) stated that over 80% of their clients were Queensland based. This is despite a number of the firms in the medium and large categories being part of national and international legal groups. For small firms the percentage was even higher, at 96.7%. Clientele for Brisbane based firms would 
therefore appear to be still largely local (State based) in nature, and their email communication reflects this. 

Regarding communication with other law firms, many law firms commented to us that whilst emailing other firms was fairly popular, there was still some hesitancy to use it too extensively for this purpose. The primary two reasons expressed were:

  1. Some still felt uneasy about the acceptability of email correspondence for matters where it may need to be produced as evidence before a Court. In these instances the more conventional means (for instance, mail and fax) were used; and

  2. Others felt that the informal nature of email communication meant that it was often not appropriate between contending firms.

These barriers were not seen to be relevant when communicating with clients.

It is interesting to note that Australian businesses in general (72%) appear to be using the research function more frequently than the law firms (50%) in our sample, despite the fact that the latter are providing primarily an advisory and information service. For small law firms the percentage was even less (33%). Fast and cheap access to current legal information via the Internet would appear to be a real opportunity for smaller firms to bridge the resource gap between themselves and the larger legal players. However our statistics show that, overall, it is the medium and large law firms that are utilising this resource, and not the small firms. 

3. WHAT INTERNET SERVICES ARE SMALL, MEDIUM AND LARGE LAW FIRMS NOT USING? 
[top]

All law firms who participated in our study identified four Internet services that were 
rarely or not used. They are:

  • Searching/collecting information on products and supplies
  • Internet Advertising
  • Buying products/supplies
  • Selling their legal services over the Internet

These four services represent the e-commerce aspects of the Internet. In particular, small firms in the sample indicated virtually no interest at all in these E-commerce services. Large and medium firms showed more interest and were beginning to explore the various e-commerce services, particularly collecting product information (although not for making actual payments online).

4. E-COMMERCE ADOPTION BY BUSINESS AS COMPARED TO LAWYERS 
[top]

E-commerce adoption by Australian businesses generally is also low, although greater than adoption rates amongst the law firms in our sample. In particular, Australian businesses are using the Internet to market and advertise far more frequently than law firms. Our sample results indicate that advertising is either 'Not Used' or 'Rarely Used' by the vast majority of law firms in all size ranges. In contrast, the Small Business Index (May, 1999) recorded that 38% of businesses overall regularly advertised and marketed their products/services over the Internet. Our study did not go into reasons why this may be so, 
although many sample participants in all size categories explained that they did not feel that advertising on the Internet was conducive to their image in the market place. The legal profession's overall conservative approach to advertising in its more adventurous forms may also stem from the long tradition of advertising restraints that have been placed upon it in the past. 

More insight into why the sample law firms are not using the Internet for E-commerce activities (particularly marketing) may be gleaned from the results of what law firms saw as the Internet’s main benefit for their practice.

TABLE: Main Benefit of the Internet

Size  Marketing to new clients Internal cost efficiencies Improved quality of service
All  23.8% 52.4% 19.0%
Small  26.7% 53.3% 13.3%
Medium  33.3% 33.3% 33.3%
Large  0% 66.7% 33.3%

From the above Table we can see that a strong majority of firms in all size categories believed that cost savings from greater internal efficiencies was the main benefit delivered by the Internet. This may explain why the communication and information access benefits of the Internet are being used far more than the e-commerce services. In comparison, the Small Business Index findings found that the main benefit businesses were seeking from using e-commerce was to increase their customer base through geographical expansion. These Australian businesses were typically those using the Internet to aggressively pursue a growth strategy (Small Business Index, 1999).
5. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION  [top]

The results of this study have highlighted the following trends:
  • Large law firms are more likely to be connected to the Internet and to have a Web page than small firms. However adoption rates for law firms are high overall, similar to those for Australian businesses generally 
  • The two most frequently used Internet services are communication services (email) and information access (research) and firms of all sizes are using these services frequently.

  • The e-commerce aspects of the Internet are not extensively used by the sample law firms, although large firms are starting to explore these services

  • Law firms of all sizes are using the Internet primarily to gain internal cost efficiencies and to improve the service that they provide to their existing client base. They are not yet using the Internet to pursue growth strategies. 

Given the small sample size (4%), many of the above results are indicative of trends only and caution should be exercised when using these findings to make inferences back to the entire law firm population. As firms continue to embrace this new technology, there will be a ‘ripple effect’ on how they deliver their services in the future.

This appears to be appreciated by the legal profession itself, with over 85% of law firms in our sample stating that they believed that the Internet would fundamentally change the way they conducted business over the next 5-10 years. Not all firms, when queried further, however, knew exactly how delivery of their service or their practice would change, or how they should meet the challenge of this new technology. 

In the next Article, we will look at how the Internet may impact upon the way law firms do business in the future. 


Ann Janssen
BA.LLB (Hons)
ann.janssen@legalmart.com.au  

Copyright. July 2000. All rights reserved.

Thanks go to Michael Fitzgerald who was co-researcher on the Brisbane Law firm survey.

 

This website is intended to provide general information only. It does not purport to be a comprehensive advice. If you want legal advice, you need to contact a Solicitor or you can access Lawyer Support within a service, usually for a fixed fee. No responsibility is accepted by Legalmart or its affiliates for the accuracy or omission of any statement, opinion, or information on this site and readers should rely on their own enquiries in making any decisions regarding their own or their client's interests. Site visitors should also note that any information that is limited to a particular state of Australia may not be applicable in other states of Australia.

The Intellectual Property on this Website including rights in respect of copyright and patents are owned by Ezylaw Pty Ltd and operated under licence by Legalmart.corp® Pty Ltd ABN 99 081 698 937. The Quicklaw conveyancing service is owned and operated by a separate entity, Do It Yourself Conveyancing Kits Pty Ltd ABN 64 007 327 291 operated from www.quicklaw.com.au and Legalmart takes no responsibility for this service.

© Copyright 1999 - 2011 Ezylaw Pty Ltd. All Rights Reserved.

Neither the concept or functionality nor the layout or wording contained in or represented by this site can be copied or used in any way whatsoever without express written consent from the owner. All offenders will be prosecuted.


4 February, 2012

Click to view our Legalmart Customer Policy

Testimonials